Skip to main content

Star Wars - The Force Awakens / Long and slow, in a multiplex led far, far astray.



In The Force Awakens a black man is tasered twice, drinks putrid water from a trough alongside an animal resembling a pig, and - in his own words - states that he used to work in sanitation. OK. Let's let those details slide. Call me politically correct. A Cambridge lefty. I can take it. By the way, that black man is the film's male lead. Does that make everything okay?

By now everyone pretty much agrees that there are no major surprises, aesthetically or narratively, in The Force Awakens. OK, maybe the aerial dogfights have a few more twists and turns than last time, and what happens to Han Solo is, well, something of a surprise (though we all saw it coming). But everything from the film's color palette to its chase-scene structure (where's the map? C'mon people!) smacks of deja vu all over again. Of course, it's supposed to. You don't make a billion dollars on a $350 million investment (that's some cabbage right there, folks!) innovating. You make it by playing to your base. This dumbed down installment of the franchise is sorely lacking in the great political intrigue and back room negotiating that took place in so many of the other Star Wars films. Let me remind everyone of the diplomatic brinksmanship that took place between the empire and the resistance in previous entries. We enjoyed watching Sith leaders, republic princesses, Jedi knights, and lost family members moving as if on a chessboard, trying to outguess, outfox, outdo each other. I do not see any of that in The Force Awakens. Once it sets up its formula it's basically an inter-galactic game of "tag, you're it" and nuance, intrigue, or mystery be damned.  But, okay, we can let that slide as well. After all, if in Jurassic World we wanted to see "more teeth" (bigger dinos), in The Force Awakens we want to see "bigger bangs", larger death stars exploding, though the screen size is still the same!

Is it unpatriotic to not have enjoyed The Force Awakens? Everyone seems to be so gaga about this movie that to dissent may be the kiss of death. OK, call me a rebel here. Sure, I'll reject The First Order and say I did not particularly enjoy watching The Force Awakens. Hang on, however: I do marvel at the technical virtuosity as well as the visual splendor of those early scenes in the desert so reminiscent of earlier Star Wars films as well as David Lean's Lawrence of Arabia (not to say Elaine May's underrated Ishtar!). And the space opera family dynamics appear to be laid out in a way designed to engage me, emotionally speaking. But when those intimate, personal exchanges take place, notably between Carrie Fisher and Harrison Ford, I leave the Star Wars galaxies and find myself in a soap opera set in the San Fernando Valley called As The Universe Turns. Schmaltz Wars, I say.

Additionally, I'm kind of concerned that, in the battle between the good guys and the bad guys, Americans may see themselves too much on the side of the good guys, the rebels (maybe so during America's revolutionary years?). Yet, if you look at the imagery in The Force Awakens, while the bad guys are visually equated with the Third Reich (always a reliable bad "other" - as in not us - guy), there are also images reminiscent of our military's actions in Vietnam. In one sequence we get the First Order sending in air power to decimate a village and storm troopers using blow torches on people and thatched huts. Maybe it's me. I got to watch the final years of the Vietnam war on television so I could not help but draw parallels. We know our government has a dark side. It has more than once engaged in warfare where there was no military parity with the other guys whatsoever. We have a well documented history of taking a sledgehammer approach against our enemies, no matter how weak they are. To my eyes the Pentagon does indeed bear some resemblance to the First Order's arsenal of people and weapons. Now that's probably an unpatriotic idea. Hard to admit, but it's true. And, who knows...maybe we are watching our complete selves up there on that screen. Part light, part dark, our conscious selves aligning with the rebels, our unconscious selves with the First Order.

As unappetizing as this movie was, I concede: I went and saw it, wanting to see it, eager to see what these characters had been up to. And here's the thing: we all want to see it because - regardless of quality or the true nature of its moral compass - it is the only example of collective, shared myth making that everyone consumes at one moment. What's bigger? Not Batman, not Jurassic, and not Pixar. Star Wars is the tale told round the campfire writ globally. Today you can chat about The Force Awakens with anyone anywhere. How's that for your small talk at the airport terminal check in line? Refuse to see it at your own peril. And, uh, may the force be with you.
















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alejandro Jodorowsky

From El Topo (1970). Alejandro Jodorowsky (right). The idea of a western as something more than a good guy (white hat) / bad guy (black hat) showdown had been pioneered by John Ford as far back as Stagecoach (1939), but few if any - filmmakers can turn a genre piece into a quest for spiritual enlightenment. Infused with iconic and surreal imagery, El Topo is considered the grandaddy of midnight cult movies, and deservedly so. Jodorowsky has said his goal with regard to cinema is to re-create the experience of taking LSD, without taking the hallucinogenic. He wants to re-write the book on how humans perceive life and themselves. Highly ambitious, his films shatter every preconceived notion we have about what cinema is supposed to be.  Imagine Luis Bunuel, Quentin Tarantino, and Gabriel Garcia Marquez rolled into one and you'd probably get Alejandro Jodorowsky. He has called himself the "father of the midnight movie" and he's probably right. Throughout his c...

In Praise of Jurassic World

Indominus Rex gets inside Jurassic World's aviary. Mouahahaah! I never thought I'd find myself telling you to see the biggest blockbuster on the planet in the summer of 2015, but - ironically - here I am telling you as much. More importantly, here is Steven Spielberg, guns a blazin'. By now the whiz kid's playbook has been co-opted, imitated, stolen, copied, and mimicked by just about everyone, but nothing beats the original. Working as executive producer, Spielberg's touch is evident throughout Jurassic World's " Wonder-kid-I'm-having-so-much-fun-Holy-crap-watch-out-for-that monster! " ride. That it's directed by someone else (whose name escapes me and I'm too lazy to look it up) is kind of secondary. This is a Steven Spielberg summer fantasia. Let's look at the evidence.  Old school Amblin' Entertainment logo indicating this is a project very close to Spielberg's heart? Check. The hero as lion tamer. Creepy opening...

Guardians of the Galaxy, Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and more.

Let's begin with the posters. True to space opera form, heroes (and heroines, and animals) in crisis/action poses. Robots, spaceships, good vs. evil. Standard stuff. Moving to shot comparison, the inevitable, obvious one, referencing Raiders, clearly done less as plagiarism and much more as homage. Moving back to Star Wars, Han Solo and Star Lord are mercenaries. Both are - at first - in it for the money. Indiana Jones has a higher calling/purpose - which will end with him never knowing what's inside the box/ark - just like we don't learn (until the very end) the meaning of Kane's "Rosebud" (some claim it's not about the sled but about Marion's sex). The parallels between Raider's closing shot and Citizen Kane's closing shot have been well established. Here are the two closing shots, just in case. Which brings us back to Han and Star. Heroic. Ready. Gunslingers. In another era, say fifty eight years ago, J...