Skip to main content
In our real time amnesiac society, writing about The Interview today may be like arriving a little late to the party, but I have to say that, watching it last night with the Katherine and the kids, some notes are in order.

For starters, don't be fooled. This is a family movie. Today's American 12 and 14 year olds are really adults disguised as children. They will see more on the interweb and talk more supposed "trash" at school than The Interview could possibly hope to do. Furthermore, if you are looking to suspend your disbelief because you seek realism, look somewhere else. The Interview shamelessly mocks itself and kids not only get that "it's only a movie", but this knowledge grants the filmmakers and audience license to ill. Satire, parody, and comedy, as we have seen recently in Paris, can really piss off individuals, splinter groups, clans, tribes, or nations. It would be too much to say the "offended" parties lead humorless lives. After all, do they not giggle at their own human foibles (like when they fart in public)? But it may not be too much to say that these same offended parties are kinda messed up in the head when a satirical film "threatens" their national security causing them to unleash a cyber war upon Sony Inc. (One of my favorite companies, by the way, because they make cameras I really like to use, notably the Sony EX1 hi def camcorder).

The Interview is an expertly made satire that actually pushes the conversation about the family of nations squarely into the public forum. I am not kidding. Can you imagine a more powerful movie that would get apathetic, apolitical American viewers (and the stoner crowd) politicized? When the lights came up I was asking myself why North Korea has isolated itself so completely. How can a nation so large and so powerful not want to join the inevitable international move to a global economic and cultural marketplace? Or maybe they do but their leaders won't let them? Are there millions of North Koreans who have so deified Kim whatever-your-name-is that they will willingly starve themselves to death? Conversely, why should we care? Because they have the bomb? Will they really use it?

The larger point (and one - among many excellent points - which the film makes) is that America likes to export democracy - even to places that may not want (or may not know they want) it. What Rogen, Franco, and Goldberg are saying is: this North Korean state is one of the last - and unfortunately nuclear - nations that not only oppresses its own, but refuses to play along with with liberalism and free market capitalism. Can't we all just get along? But they are packaging this message in a bawdy, raunchy, politically incorrect, satire that audiences from 12 to 80 can understand.  I plan to see it again - if only for Eminem's cameo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Interview_%282014_film%29

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alejandro Jodorowsky

From El Topo (1970). Alejandro Jodorowsky (right). The idea of a western as something more than a good guy (white hat) / bad guy (black hat) showdown had been pioneered by John Ford as far back as Stagecoach (1939), but few if any - filmmakers can turn a genre piece into a quest for spiritual enlightenment. Infused with iconic and surreal imagery, El Topo is considered the grandaddy of midnight cult movies, and deservedly so. Jodorowsky has said his goal with regard to cinema is to re-create the experience of taking LSD, without taking the hallucinogenic. He wants to re-write the book on how humans perceive life and themselves. Highly ambitious, his films shatter every preconceived notion we have about what cinema is supposed to be.  Imagine Luis Bunuel, Quentin Tarantino, and Gabriel Garcia Marquez rolled into one and you'd probably get Alejandro Jodorowsky. He has called himself the "father of the midnight movie" and he's probably right. Throughout his c...

In Praise of Jurassic World

Indominus Rex gets inside Jurassic World's aviary. Mouahahaah! I never thought I'd find myself telling you to see the biggest blockbuster on the planet in the summer of 2015, but - ironically - here I am telling you as much. More importantly, here is Steven Spielberg, guns a blazin'. By now the whiz kid's playbook has been co-opted, imitated, stolen, copied, and mimicked by just about everyone, but nothing beats the original. Working as executive producer, Spielberg's touch is evident throughout Jurassic World's " Wonder-kid-I'm-having-so-much-fun-Holy-crap-watch-out-for-that monster! " ride. That it's directed by someone else (whose name escapes me and I'm too lazy to look it up) is kind of secondary. This is a Steven Spielberg summer fantasia. Let's look at the evidence.  Old school Amblin' Entertainment logo indicating this is a project very close to Spielberg's heart? Check. The hero as lion tamer. Creepy opening...

Guardians of the Galaxy, Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and more.

Let's begin with the posters. True to space opera form, heroes (and heroines, and animals) in crisis/action poses. Robots, spaceships, good vs. evil. Standard stuff. Moving to shot comparison, the inevitable, obvious one, referencing Raiders, clearly done less as plagiarism and much more as homage. Moving back to Star Wars, Han Solo and Star Lord are mercenaries. Both are - at first - in it for the money. Indiana Jones has a higher calling/purpose - which will end with him never knowing what's inside the box/ark - just like we don't learn (until the very end) the meaning of Kane's "Rosebud" (some claim it's not about the sled but about Marion's sex). The parallels between Raider's closing shot and Citizen Kane's closing shot have been well established. Here are the two closing shots, just in case. Which brings us back to Han and Star. Heroic. Ready. Gunslingers. In another era, say fifty eight years ago, J...