Skip to main content

The Wolf of Wall St. Comparing film, book, screenplay.

To compare the three products, movie, book, screenplay...

When Teresa, Belfort's first wife, points out a want ad in a paper for a stockbroker, Scorsese visualizes it through a series of close up of the want ads; our eyes are led from ad to ad until we're glued to an extreme close up of the ad Teresa's seen. In the screenplay the phrase is:


Sequence is also reinterpreted. 

While the book tends to move - more or less - linearly, things aren't nearly as chronological in the screenplay and book. 

And yet the leaps in time appear to - paradoxically - make the film feel more like the book's sequencing. 

Example: Very early on, in chapter 2 in the book, shows the Duchess hurling water at Belfort for womanizing. In the screenplay, however, it's scene 116 located on page 58 (about an hour into the action), and in the film it's situated even later. 

Absent from the screenplay and the film is the ensuing, more involved Steve Madden chapter. No, not the shellacking Madden gets in the office, addressing the wolves before Belfort rescues him; that's in all three products. I'm referring to Belfort's later career decision to work with Madden in his office in Queens building the shoe empire. Is this part of the material that Scorsese removed in order to get the film's run time down to three hours from it's original four? 

Belfort's depravity - and his wicked sense of humor - remain intact throughout all three products. 

Naturally, the book has more depravity than either the script or movie. All three products rely on the first person voice over, right down to the passages when Belfort stops explaining his devious finance schemes, adding lines like "it doesn't matter". 

Where's DiCaprio in all of this? 

In the screenplay, during his first sales call in the penny stock offices on Long Island, we get a man sitting at desk speaking with silver tongue as he closes a deal. 



No indication in the script about what DeCaprio might be doing aside from talking into the phone.

But in the film DiCaprio stands and simulates fucking his customer from behind while talking on the phone as his co-workers watch in amazement. 

Who came up with that? Scorsese? DiCaprio?

The speeches...paeans to rampant free market capitalism. 

The book provides plenty of source material used just about verbatim in the speeches. 

Perhaps the most emblematic of them all is this one, taken almost word for word from the book:



And, just before that one, we get:



Taking a look at the comical Quaalude scene at the country club pay phone and entrance, we get a nice view of how the three products (book, screenplay, movie) work together.

Here's the book:


Here's the script:




A still from the film:


Scorsese talks about DiCaprio's comedic gifts as being reminiscent of Jerry Lewis and Jacques Tati. And he's right. Compositionally, the scene outside the club is quite elegant. The distance between DiCaprio at the top of the stairs and his car is but 20 feet but the camera, passively in the middle, looks at both ends of the journey and it feels like a million miles.

---

Here's a look...behind the scenes...


And while we're at it, more Scorsese but for Goodfellas at



















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The End of the Tour

Great poster! Beautiful concept. The image tells us everything we'd want to know about the film. Especially gutsy is the decision to exclude Jesse Eisenberg's and Jason Segel's faces.  It's called a  two-hander . In the theatre it connotes a play with only two actors. hink  Driving Miss Daisy  or most plays by Samuel Beckett. In  The End of the Tour , Jason Segel and Jesse Eisenberg and director James Ponsoldt take the two hander into movie land, albeit with a supporting cast (including a hilarious comedic acting turn courtesy of Joan Cusack) and make it into a genuine, moving, funny, and heart-wrenching bit of cinema.  The celebrity writer and his admirer. Jesse Eisenberg and Jason Segel.  We may never know who David Foster Wallace really was. Already his estate is disowning this film - but the truth about that is also  up for grabs. All we have is the film, exhibit A (if you will), and what we read about it, along with Mr. Wallace'...

Star Wars - The Force Awakens / Long and slow, in a multiplex led far, far astray.

In The Force Awakens a black man is tasered twice, drinks putrid water from a trough alongside an animal resembling a pig, and - in his own words - states that he used to work in sanitation. OK. Let's let those details slide. Call me politically correct. A Cambridge lefty. I can take it. By the way, that black man is the film's male lead. Does that make everything okay? By now everyone pretty much agrees that there are no major surprises, aesthetically or narratively, in The Force Awakens. OK, maybe the aerial dogfights have a few more twists and turns than last time, and what happens to Han Solo is, well, something of a surprise (though we all saw it coming). But everything from the film's color palette to its chase-scene structure (where's the map? C'mon people!) smacks of deja vu all over again. Of course, it's supposed to. You don't make a billion dollars on a $350 million investment (that's some cabbage right there, folks!) innovating . You ma...

Alejandro Jodorowsky

From El Topo (1970). Alejandro Jodorowsky (right). The idea of a western as something more than a good guy (white hat) / bad guy (black hat) showdown had been pioneered by John Ford as far back as Stagecoach (1939), but few if any - filmmakers can turn a genre piece into a quest for spiritual enlightenment. Infused with iconic and surreal imagery, El Topo is considered the grandaddy of midnight cult movies, and deservedly so. Jodorowsky has said his goal with regard to cinema is to re-create the experience of taking LSD, without taking the hallucinogenic. He wants to re-write the book on how humans perceive life and themselves. Highly ambitious, his films shatter every preconceived notion we have about what cinema is supposed to be.  Imagine Luis Bunuel, Quentin Tarantino, and Gabriel Garcia Marquez rolled into one and you'd probably get Alejandro Jodorowsky. He has called himself the "father of the midnight movie" and he's probably right. Throughout his c...